biologyscienceТимирязевский биологический журналTimiryazev Biological Journal2949-4710ФГБОУ ВО РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева (ФГБОУ ВО РГАУ-МСХА имени К.А. Тимирязева)10.26897/2949-4710-2025-3-1-4-03biologyscience-159Research Article4 - ЗООЛОГИЯ, ФИЗИОЛОГИЯ ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ЖИВОТНЫХ4 - ZOOLOGY, HUMAN AND ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGYПрименение сахарозаменителей в кормлении свиней: библиографический обзорApplication of sweeteners in pig feeding: a bibliographic reviewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-5732МаксимовВ. И.MaksimovV. I.

Владимир Ильич Максимов, профессор, доктор биологических наук, профессор кафедры физиологии, фармакологии и токсикологии им. А.Н. Голикова и И.Е. Мозгова

109472, г. Москва, Орликов переулок, д. 1/11

Vladimir Il. Maksimov Professor, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor of department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology A.N. Golikov and I.E. Mozgov

Moscow

dr.maximov@gmail.comВолковаМ. А.VolkovaM. A.

Маргарита Алексеевна Волкова, аспирант 4 курса факультета ветеринарной медицины, кафедры физиологии, фармакологии и токсикологии им. А.Н. Голикова и И.Е. Мозгова

109472, г. Москва, Орликов переулок, д. 1/11

Margarita A. Volkova, 4th year graduate student of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology named after A.N. Golikov and I.E. Mozgov

Moscow

koruzova@mail.ruЕрховаК. А.ErkhovaK. A.

Ксения Алексеевна Ерхова, обучающийся 4 курса факультета экологии и биотехнологии

109472, г. Москва, Орликов переулок, д. 1/11

Ksenia A. Erkhova, 4th year 1st group student of the Faculty of Ecology and Biotechnology

Moscow

kseniyaerhova@bk.ruМосковская государственная академия ветеринарной медицины и биотехнологии имени К.И. СкрябинаРоссияMoscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after K.I. SkryabinRussian Federation20252708202531202531403202531403Copyright © Максимов В.И., Волкова М.А., Ерхова К.А., 20252025Максимов В.И., Волкова М.А., Ерхова К.А.Maksimov V.I., Volkova M.A., Erkhova K.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bioscience-journal.com/jour/article/view/159

Применение сахарозаменителей в качестве кормовых добавок для повышения привлекательности кормов является безопасным, физиологичным, актуальным и экономически выгодным методом по улучшению потребительских свойств кормов и повышению продуктивности животных. Однако несмотря на их широкое распространение, в работах отечественных авторов встречаются лишь единичные исследования применения сахарозаменителей у животных. Таким образом, целью данной работы явился библиографический обзор научных данных о применении сахарозаменителей в кормлении свиней, понимании их эффектов на физиологические процессы и функции в организме животных, определении негативных и положительных их влияний. Для выявления исследований сахарозаменителей у свиней использовалась комбинация поисковых запросов по ключевым словам: сахарозаменители, свиньи, физиология, кормовые добавки, интенсивные подсластители в базах данных PubMed Advanced Search Builder, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection и ELibrary. В результате получен перечень релевантных источников, состоящий из 38 научных работ. Значительное количество проанализированных источников, посвященных изучению эффективности и безопасности различных сахарозаменителей в кормлении различных видов животных и человека, показывает существующие пробелы в знаниях и предполагает, что для понимания роли сахарозаменителей в физиологии и питании свиней необходимы дополнительные исследования. В статье рассматривается влияние различных сахарозаменителей на организм свиней и их целесообразность использования на свиноводческих хозяйствах, а также перспективы повышения их эффективности: использование смесей сахарозаменителей с различным их соотношением; использование различных сахарозаменителей в комбинации с различными кормами; разработка смесей индивидуально для потребностей свиней в зависимости от пола, возраста, породы, целевого назначения, а также разработка комплексных кормовых добавок с содержанием вкусоароматического компонента.

Application of sweeteners as feed additives to increase the attractiveness of feed is a safe, physiological, relevant and cost-effective method to improve feed quality of feed and increase animal productivity. Despite their widespread use, however, only a few studies on the use of sweeteners in animals have been published by domestic authors. Thus, this study aimed to provide a bibliographic review of scientific data on the use of sweeteners in pig feeding, to understand their effects on physiological processes and functions in animals, and to determine their pros and cons. To identify relevant studies, a combination of search queries using the keywords “sweeteners,” “pigs,” “physiology,” “feed additives,” and “intensive sweeteners” was used in the PubMed Advanced Search Builder, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ELibrary databases. As a result, a list of 38 relevant scientific papers was obtained. The significant number of analyzed sources devoted to studying the effectiveness and safety of various sweeteners for feeding different animal species and humans shows existing knowledge gaps and suggests the need for further research to better understand the role of sweeteners in the physiology and nutrition of pigs. This paper discusses the effects of various sweeteners on pigs’ bodies and the feasibility of using them on pig farms. It also explores ways to increase their effectiveness, such as using mixtures of sweeteners with different ratios, using various sweeteners with different feeds, and developing mixtures for pigs’ specific needs based on sex, age, breed, and purpose. Additionally, it discusses developing complex feed additives containing flavoring compounds.

сахарозаменителисвиньифизиологиякормовые добавкиинтенсивные подсластителиsweetenerspigsphysiologyfeed additivesintense sweetenersReferencesДельцов А.А., Белова К.О. Аналитический обзор рынка йодсодержащих кормовых добавок для животных // Ветеринария, зоотехния и биотехнология. 2024. № 3. С. 12-22. https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202403002Deltsov A.A., Belova K.O. Analytical review of the market for iodinecontaining feed additives for animals. Veterinariya, zootekhniya i biotekhnologiya. 2024(3):12-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202403002Hellekant G., Danilova V. Taste in domestic pig, Sus scrofa. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 1999;82:8-24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.1999.00206.xHellekant G., Danilova V. Taste in domestic pig, Sus scrofa. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 1999;82:8-24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.1999.00206.xKai-Jing Y. Effects of different sweeteners on behavior and neurotransmitters release in mice. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2020;57(1):113-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04036-6Kai-Jing Y. Effects of different sweeteners on behavior and neurotransmitters release in mice. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2020;57(1):113-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04036-6Jansen M.R., Kim K. Evaluating the Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Pigs: A Systematic Review. Animals. 2024;14:3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14203032Jansen M.R., Kim K. Evaluating the Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Pigs: A Systematic Review. Animals. 2024;14:3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14203032Kennedy J.M., Baldwin B.A. Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and non-nutritive sweet solutions. Animal Behaviour. 1972;20:706-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80142-8Kennedy J.M., Baldwin B.A. Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and non-nutritive sweet solutions. Animal Behaviour. 1972;20:706-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80142-8McLaughlin C.L., Baile C.A., Buckholtz L.L., Freeman S.K. Preferred flavors and performance of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 1983;56:1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5661287x.PMID:6874611McLaughlin C.L., Baile C.A., Buckholtz L.L., Freeman S.K. Preferred flavors and performance of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 1983;56:1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5661287x.PMID:6874611Avena N.M., Rada P., Moise N., Hoebel B.G. Sucrose sham feeding on a binge schedule releases accumbens dopamine repeatedly and eliminates the acetylcholine satiety response. Neuroscience. 2006;139(3):813-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.037Avena N.M., Rada P., Moise N., Hoebel B.G. Sucrose sham feeding on a binge schedule releases accumbens dopamine repeatedly and eliminates the acetylcholine satiety response. Neuroscience. 2006;139(3):813-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.037Kellie A.K., Dane W.F., Ryan P.M., Samer W.E. et. al. Supplementation with artificial sweetener and capsaicin alters metabolic flexibility and performance in heat-stressed and feed-restricted pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2022;100(8):195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac195Kellie A.K., Dane W.F., Ryan P.M., Samer W.E. et. al. Supplementation with artificial sweetener and capsaicin alters metabolic flexibility and performance in heat-stressed and feed-restricted pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2022;100(8):195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac195Roura E., Fu M. Taste, Nutrient Sensing and Feed Intake in Pigs (130 Years of Research: Then, Now and Future). Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2017;233:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.08.002Roura E., Fu M. Taste, Nutrient Sensing and Feed Intake in Pigs (130 Years of Research: Then, Now and Future). Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2017;233:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.08.002Daly K., Moran A.W., Al-Rammahi M., Weatherburn D. et al. Non-Nutritive Sweetener Activation of the Pig Sweet Taste Receptor T1R2-T1R3 In Vitro Mirrors Sweetener Stimulation of the Gut-Expressed Receptor In Vivo. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2021;542:54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.032Daly K., Moran A.W., Al-Rammahi M., Weatherburn D. et al. Non-Nutritive Sweetener Activation of the Pig Sweet Taste Receptor T1R2-T1R3 In Vitro Mirrors Sweetener Stimulation of the Gut-Expressed Receptor In Vivo. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2021;542:54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.032Lei Y., Kim J.K., Tran H.N., Kim I.H. Effect of feed flavor and sweetener on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and diarrhea score in weaning pigs. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017;44:77-85. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170009Lei Y., Kim J.K., Tran H.N., Kim I.H. Effect of feed flavor and sweetener on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and diarrhea score in weaning pigs. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017;44:77-85. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170009Chang L., Won Y., Jihwan L., Woo K. et al. Effects of artificial sweeteners on feed palatability and performance in weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2018;99:307-314. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0143Chang L., Won Y., Jihwan L., Woo K. et al. Effects of artificial sweeteners on feed palatability and performance in weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2018;99:307-314. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0143Daly K., Darby A.C., Hall N., Nau A. et al. Dietary supplementation with lactose or artificial sweetener enhances swine gut Lactobacillus population abundance. British Journal of Nutrition. 2014;111:30-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513002274Daly K., Darby A.C., Hall N., Nau A. et al. Dietary supplementation with lactose or artificial sweetener enhances swine gut Lactobacillus population abundance. British Journal of Nutrition. 2014;111:30-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513002274Daly K., Darby A.C., Hall N., Wilkinson M.C. et al. Bacterial Sensing Underlies Artificial Sweetener-induced Growth of Gut Lactobacillus. Environmental Microbiology. 2016;18:2159-2171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12942Daly K., Darby A.C., Hall N., Wilkinson M.C. et al. Bacterial Sensing Underlies Artificial Sweetener-induced Growth of Gut Lactobacillus. Environmental Microbiology. 2016;18:2159-2171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12942Sterk A., Schlegel P., Mul A.J., Ubbink-Blanksma M. et al. Effects of sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance in group-housed weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86:2990-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0591Sterk A., Schlegel P., Mul A.J., Ubbink-Blanksma M. et al. Effects of sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance in group-housed weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86:2990-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0591Suez J., Korem T., Zilberman-Schapira G., Segal E. et al. Non-caloric artificial sweeteners and the microbiome: findings and challenges. Gut Microbes. 2015;6:149-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1017700Suez J., Korem T., Zilberman-Schapira G., Segal E. et al. Non-caloric artificial sweeteners and the microbiome: findings and challenges. Gut Microbes. 2015;6:149-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1017700Wang L.S., Shi Z., Shi B.M., Shan A.S. Effects of Dietary Stevioside/Rebaudioside A on the Growth Performance and Diarrhea Incidence of Weaned Piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2014;187:104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.014Wang L.S., Shi Z., Shi B.M., Shan A.S. Effects of Dietary Stevioside/Rebaudioside A on the Growth Performance and Diarrhea Incidence of Weaned Piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2014;187:104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.014Maenz D.D., Patience J.F., Wolynetz M.S. Effect of Water Sweetener on the Performance of Newly Weaned Pigs Offered Medicated and Unmedicated Feed. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1993;73:669-672. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas93-073Maenz D.D., Patience J.F., Wolynetz M.S. Effect of Water Sweetener on the Performance of Newly Weaned Pigs Offered Medicated and Unmedicated Feed. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1993;73:669-672. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas93-073Zhu L., Wang G., Dong B., Peng C.C. et al. Effects of sweetener neotame on diet preference, performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2016;214:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.013Zhu L., Wang G., Dong B., Peng C.C. et al. Effects of sweetener neotame on diet preference, performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2016;214:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.013Zhang W., Heng J., Kim S.W., Chen F. et al. Dietary Enzymatically-Treated Artemisia annua L. Supplementation Could Alleviate Oxidative Injury and Improve Reproductive Performance of Sows Reared under High Ambient Temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2020;94:102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102751Zhang W., Heng J., Kim S.W., Chen F. et al. Dietary Enzymatically-Treated Artemisia annua L. Supplementation Could Alleviate Oxidative Injury and Improve Reproductive Performance of Sows Reared under High Ambient Temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2020;94:102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102751Bian X., Chi L., Gao B., Tu P. et al. Artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium affects the gutmicrobiome and body weight gain in CD-1 mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6): e0178426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178426Bian X., Chi L., Gao B., Tu P. et al. Artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium affects the gutmicrobiome and body weight gain in CD-1 mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6): e0178426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178426Chi L., Bian X., Gao B., Tu P. et al. Effects of the artificial sweetener neotame on the gut micro-biome and fecal metabolites in mice. Molecules. 2018;23(2):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020367Chi L., Bian X., Gao B., Tu P. et al. Effects of the artificial sweetener neotame on the gut micro-biome and fecal metabolites in mice. Molecules. 2018;23(2):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020367Elnaga N.A., Massoud M.I., Yousef M.I., Mohamed H.H. Effect of stevia sweetener consumption as non-caloricsweetening on body weight gain and biochemicas parame-ters in overweight female rats. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;61:155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.11.008Elnaga N.A., Massoud M.I., Yousef M.I., Mohamed H.H. Effect of stevia sweetener consumption as non-caloricsweetening on body weight gain and biochemicas parame-ters in overweight female rats. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;61:155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.11.008Juncai C., Yan L., Yang Z., Shiqian H., Lingbin L. et al. Beyond sweetness: The high-intensity sweeteners and farm animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020;267:114571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114571Juncai C., Yan L., Yang Z., Shiqian H., Lingbin L. et al. Beyond sweetness: The high-intensity sweeteners and farm animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020;267:114571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114571Aldinger S.M., Speer V.C., Hays V.W., Catron D.V. Effect of saccharin and sucrose on the performance of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 1961;20:249-254. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJAS-2018-0143Aldinger S.M., Speer V.C., Hays V.W., Catron D.V. Effect of saccharin and sucrose on the performance of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 1961;20:249-254. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJAS-2018-0143Guzmán-Pino S.A., Solà-Oriol D., Figueroa J., Dwyer D.M. et al. Effect of a long-term exposure to concentrated sucrose and maltodextrin solutions on the preference, appetence, feed intake and growth performance of post-weaned piglets. Physiology and Behavior. 2015;141:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.009Guzmán-Pino S.A., Solà-Oriol D., Figueroa J., Dwyer D.M. et al. Effect of a long-term exposure to concentrated sucrose and maltodextrin solutions on the preference, appetence, feed intake and growth performance of post-weaned piglets. Physiology and Behavior. 2015;141:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.009Wenwei Z., Holden H., Limin G., Wenqing L. et al. Effects of sweetener sucralose on diet preference, growth performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2020;5(33):802-811. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0863Wenwei Z., Holden H., Limin G., Wenqing L. et al. Effects of sweetener sucralose on diet preference, growth performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2020;5(33):802-811. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0863Ochetim S., Odur I.D. The effect of varying the level of saccharin on the performance of young pigs. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal. 1979;44:202-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.1979.11663009Ochetim S., Odur I.D. The effect of varying the level of saccharin on the performance of young pigs. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal. 1979;44:202-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.1979.11663009Glaser D., Wanner M., Tinti J.M., Nofre C. Gustatory responses of pigs to various natural and artificial compounds known to be sweet in man. Food Chemistry. 2000;68:375-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00212-5Glaser D., Wanner M., Tinti J.M., Nofre C. Gustatory responses of pigs to various natural and artificial compounds known to be sweet in man. Food Chemistry. 2000;68:375-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00212-5Clouard C., Chataignier M., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., Val-Laillet D. Flavour Preference Acquired via a Beverage-Induced Conditioning and Its Transposition to Solid Food: Sucrose but Not Maltodextrin or Saccharin Induced Significant Flavour Preferences in Pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2012;136(1):26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.007Clouard C., Chataignier M., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., Val-Laillet D. Flavour Preference Acquired via a Beverage-Induced Conditioning and Its Transposition to Solid Food: Sucrose but Not Maltodextrin or Saccharin Induced Significant Flavour Preferences in Pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2012;136(1):26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.007Yan L., Jang H.D., Kim I.H. Creep Feed: Effects of Feed Flavor Supplementation on Pre- and Post-weaning Performance and Behavior of Piglet and Sow. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2011;24(6):851-856. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11011Yan L., Jang H.D., Kim I.H. Creep Feed: Effects of Feed Flavor Supplementation on Pre- and Post-weaning Performance and Behavior of Piglet and Sow. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2011;24(6):851-856. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11011

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.